Improved Management Generation Of Abstracts -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Improved Management Generation Of Abstracts? Answer: Introduction The paper mainly focuses on the concepts of complex project management. It is identified that in this paper, proper explanation on the causes, environments as well as properties of project management are elaborated. The paper reflects on the utilization of project management tools and techniques for managing various types of complex projects. Proper reviews on different project cases are critically analyzed. According to Ahern, Leavy and Byrne (2014), complexity is generally utilized in order to illustrate projects that are quite difficult to execute as per the understanding of the project team members. The complexity of the projects creates negative impact on the progress of the project and it enhances time as well as budget of the project. There are number of causes of complexities within the project and the causes of the complexities mainly include unhelpful behavior, failure to appreciate systemicity, simplistic project management as well as over-ambitious strategic management (S chwalbe 2015).The paper focuses on the design as well as construction of T-REX project that faces complexities in managing the project. The paper elaborates the causes, environment as well as properties of complexities that are mainly associated with the T-REX project (Puerto, Shane and Gransberg 2013). The T-REX case study suggests that proper environment awareness program is needed in complex project so that the project environment will properly execute the project. The properties of project states that if a project manager faces difficulty in executing the project due to any of the technical or management related issues then the project is considered to be complex. On the other hand, the paper reflects on the Arrow construction company that manages project complexities by using appropriate project management tools and techniques. The use of proper tools and techniques are quite important for resolving the complexities that the construction company faces. The tools of the project are generally identified as per the nature of the project so that they must suit with the project complexity (Bing.com 2018).The perception of project complexity is greatly influenced due to the experience as well as personal capabilities of the key stakeholders who are mainly involved in the project for making proper judgment in context to the project (Kerzner 2017). The project also highlights on the nature as well as degree of the projects in order to analyze the importance of appropriate project nature. The paper discusses that proper analysis on project nature is generally necessary in order to identify the expected level of complication at the starting of the proj ect so that the project stakeholders can be able to control as well as monitor the project effectively. Discussion i) Introduction and Summary According to Fleming and Koppelman (2016), understanding complexity in project management is considered significant for the project managers due to the differences that is mainly associated with the goal attainment as well as decision making processes. It is identified that projects have become much more complex due to number of increasing factors like turbulent environment, large amount of required resources, as well as due to large number of diversity in the actors of the project. The significance of project complexity in the process of project management can be properly acknowledged with the help of factors that includes planning, coordination as well as control. In addition to this, it is stated by Svejvig and Andersen (2015) that every project has its unique problems however, the challenge of the project is amplified in context to complex environment and thus proper environmental awareness by project managers is needed during complex situations. Furthermore, it is opined by Verz uh (2015) that complexity is generally relative to the understanding of an individual. It is suggested that complexity is one of the property that is always encountered in activities at the frontiers of knowledge and psychology of the individual who are generally involved with the project. Evidence and examples Causes, environments and properties of complex projects with proper evidence and examples The design build of T-REX project is considered complex. It is identified that the project manager needs to integrate the construction as well as design of multi modal project that is very much complex. With the selection of design, build method the project was completed by the contractors two years ahead of the schedule (Puerto, Shane and Gransberg 2013). However, it is analyzed that the project has lots of parts as well as interconnections. The contractor faces lot of difficulties in executing all the parts of the projects and their interconnections in a very much less time in comparison to the estimated time. The causes of complexity within the project of T-REX are elaborated below: Unhelpful behavior: According to Svejvig and Andersen (2015), complexity in the T-REX projects mainly occurs as people with different interest, cultures, loyalties as well as interactions are put together in order to deliver a specific project or program. It is identified that people are not always rational in context to a specific decision, which helps in making their behavior liable to get involved and difficult to predict. For example, the unhelpful behaviors of the team members delays decisions making process and interfere with the design and construction of T-REX project. Failure to appreciate systemicity: As the project manager of T-REX project faces difficulty in breaking the project successfully into number of constituents then the entire project as a whole will become complex for the team members. Simplistic Project management: In T-REX project, one of the mental models that is bought by the project managers is that they faces difficulty in understanding the appropriate tools and techniques that are helpful for the management of the project and as result number of complexities occur within the project (Verzuh 2015). For example, a simplistic model of risk management is not used then it is quite difficult to manage the risks that are mainly associated with the project The challenges that the contractor of T-REX project faces in completing the numerous parts as well as interconnections two years before the estimated deadline by utilizing design build method can be amplified in context to complex environments. In order to work effectively for making the project successful, the project managers needs to start environmental awareness program so that they can manage the project challenges within the complex environment effectively (Browning 2014). The PMI mainly identifies six main conditions that help in enhancing the chances of project successes within a complex environment. The conditions mainly include leadership, portfolio management, proper collaboration, performance measurements as well as aligning various structures of the organization (Locatelli, Mancini and Romano 2014). In addition to this, it is also very much necessary to understand the complex environment of the project by scanning it appropriately with the help of SWOT analysis. It is stated by Klein, Biesenthal and Dehlin (2015), that nearly all large as well as small projects help in exhibiting characteristics of complexity. It is identified that in T-REX projects, the challenges for management stem from various assumptions must be made before the planning of the project. The main properties of complex project are that it is mainly relative to the understanding of the individuals (Heagney 2016). It is analyzed that the project which are complex, creates problems for the team members in understanding however there is limits to the understanding of the people who are involved with the project and as a result complexity is considered as a characteristics of project. The tools and techniques of project management are utilized for reducing the complexities of the project. It is can be concluded that the design and construction project of T-REX faces lot of complexities in completing the project before the estimated time by utilizing design build method. The steps or reasons of complexities in the projects are properly illustrated. It is analyzed that in order to resolve the project related challenges, the organizations need to utilize environment awareness program so that the challenges of the project can be easily resolved in spite of the complex environment of the organization. In addition to this, it is very much necessary to analyze the properties of complexities quite effectively so that the level of complexity can be identified easily. It is stated by Conforto et al. (2014) that traditional project management approaches mainly assumes that the context of the project are unchanging and thus the key factors that are in spite of their complexities are reducible to various unambiguous elements for control and management. While the assumptions have simplified the entire task, it is identified that that the tools and techniques does not work within the project then the project is considered complex (Hornstein 2015). The various tools for complex projects helps in drawing the latest research in different areas of project management, system thinking as well as complexity theory for providing a proper reference to understand as well as manage the complexities of programmes as well as projects. The tools as well as techniques that are utilized in the project are helpful for the project manager so that they can easily manage complex projects. ii) Evidence The Arrow Construction Australia is one of the construction companies that engage in ground rebuilding when earthquakes devastated Christchurch (Bing.com 2018). It is identified that by braving harsh conditions as well as limited months of daylight, the company properly refurbished Scott base in Antarctica. It is analyzed that management of complex projects takes much more than coordination of steel as well as concrete (McKenna and Baume 2015). The gap that exists between the boardroom as well as construction site can be resolved by managing proper tools as well as techniques of project management. The project is heavily time constrained that in order to complete the project within time in spite of the complexities, the project manager utilizes the tools and techniques that are helpful in resolving the project complexities quite effectively. The tools and techniques that are utilized are as follows: Risk management: It is stated by Mir and Pinnington (2014) that within the environment of project there is always a chance of occurring adverse conditions, which mainly causes the project to fail or fail to meet various objectives of the project. However, having proper risk management tool helps in determining the project risk with their level of impact so that the risks as well as challenges associated with the project can be resolved quite effectively. In addition to this, the project managers must involve in scenario planning in order to identify the uncertainties as well as risks that are associated with the project. It is analyzed that scenario planning is not about determining the future but it is about exploring the future of the project. Budgeting process: According to Sudlow et al. (2015), budget is considered as a forecast or a quantified plan of action. It is identified that proper quantified plan of action assists in itemizing income as well as expenditure of the project. Budgetary planning is considered as a tool that assists in creating project budget as one of the part of project planning process. In order to produce the project budget, it is necessary to prepare a budget manual as well as budget committee so that proper planning; resource utilization, motivation as well as integration within the project can be performed properly. Critical path analysis: It is identified that critical path is utilized as a technique for good visual communication as well as planning for effective management of time. It is identified that critical path analysis helps in clearly displaying the interdependent relationships business generally existed between various activities as well as tasks that generally needs to be completed (Riol and Thuillier 2015). The critical path analysis helps in enabling proper effective resource planning which does not allow resources to move directly substitutable between various tasks. Gantt charts: It is stated by Fisher, Pillemer and Amabile (2017) that Gantt chart is considered as a project management tool, which is considered as a horizontal bar that is utilized for scheduling the entire project effectively. The Gantt chart can be utilized for planning the timescale of the entire project, which generally can be used for estimating various resources effectively. The Gantt charts are generally used for planning, coordinating as well as tracking various tasks that are mainly associated with the project. The Gantt charts are found to be very much effective for small projects and it is helpful for resolving issues as well as challenges related with the project. Work breakdown structure: The work breakdown structure is considered as an important tool that helps in planning effectively for breaking the key tasks of the projects into number of small units that are manageable. It generally assists in producing detailed list of tasks that helps in reducing project complexity and further assists in providing proper method of costing, scheduling as well as resource planning for a project (Mok, Shen and Yang 2015). It is analyzed that during a project, proper financial control can be properly achieved by actual expenditure. The WBS helps improving the resource planning as well as efficiency of the resources so that the project related issues can be managed effectively. It can be concluded that Arrow Construction Australia helps in resolving the complexities of the project by utilizing proper tools and techniques by the project managers. It is identified that proper tools and techniques like risk management, budgeting process, critical path analysis, and Gantt chart as well as work breakdown structure. The paper elaborates the significance of the project management tools that are used by the project managers in order to resolve the complexities that are mainly related with the project. Degree and nature of project cases discussed According to Heldman (2015), analysis of project, complexities are very much helpful in evaluating risks in real projects. The nature of project complexities can be determined in terms of time, cost, team composition, flexibility, violation of requirement, strategic importance, level of organizational change as well as level of proper IT complexities. On the other hand, degree of project complexity can be determined by analyzing the complexities of the project and the related factors that causes complexities within the project. The degree of project complexity assists in measuring the difficulty of executing a complex production process appropriately. It is stated by Klakegg (2016) that project complexity helps in measuring the difficulty of executing a complex process, which is considered complicated in an intricate operational network for forming proper workflow. It is identified that it is completed within proper stipulated cost, time as well as quality for achieving required func tion without creating conflict number of parties who are generally involved within the entire process. According to Baptista et al. (2016), the nature of construction as well as design of the project T-REX is found to be complex. It is identified that project that is selected is one of the transportation expansion project that is generally known as T-REX project that is mainly constructed through Colorado area. It mainly consists of 17 miles of highway expansion. It is analyzed that by utilizing design build traditional design bid method, the project would require around 7 years to complete the project however in order to minimize the time the contractors utilizes design build method (Puerto, Shane and Gransberg 2013). It is analyzed that the required time for the project reduces but the entire team with the project managers faces number of complexities due to number of interconnections as well as parts within the project. The main complexity is to complete the entire project succes sfully before the estimated time. It is identified by Rezvani et al. (2016) that in order to reduce project related complexities the project managers needs to analyze the organizational environment and the causes of the complexities. The steps that are before the project manager for reducing project complexity is resolve it, reduce it or live with it. In addition to this, one of the significant steps for minimizing the complexities of the project is by making the project complexities less severe so that they will create less impact on the project (Lu et al. 2015). It is analyzed that the nature as well as degree of project complexities can be identified with the help of proper tools. The tools that helps in addressing the degree of complexity includes earned vale, soft thinking tools as well as problem structuring tools. The tools are quite helpful in exhibiting proper structural complexity, which is generally applied in large number of project (Martens and Carvalho 2017). Furthermore the nature of the projects can be reviewed by utilizing tools that generally includes tools for mapping complexities, system anatomy tools as well as time linked semi structures. On the other hand, it is opined by Bing.com (2018) that the Arrow Construction Australia faces lot of complexities in moving with ground rebuilding when earthquakes devastated Christchurch. It is identified that by braving harsh conditions as well as limited months of daylight, the company properly refurbished Scott base in Antarctica. In order to complete the project successfully, the project managers of the company utilizes proper tools as well as techniques that are quite helpful in managing the complexities of the project (Kassem et al. 2015). It is analyzed that the degree of complexity within the project is analyzed properly by reviewing its nature successfully. The utilization of proper project management tools and techniques are helpful in resolving the complexities of the project effectively as per the degree of complexity within the project. The degree of complexity within the project is considered significant as it helps in providing proper information about project recognition, internalization as well as future changes. The project uses number of tools that suits the nature of project complexities in order to resolve it. It is opined by Lientz and Rea (2016) that one of the emerging tool that helps in classifying projects have generally proved to be very much useful in helping number of key stakeholders for recognizing the complications within the project. Being properly identifying the nature of complexity, the expected level of complication at the starting of each phase of the project generally assists the project stakeholders to control as well as monitor the project depending on the nature of the project complexity (Rezvani et al. 2016). Furthermore, another tool, which is named as time, linked semi structures are generally collected from the project observation. As per the observation, performance is considered as one of the critical driver in the environment of project, which is generally interlinked with various creative team activities. It can be concluded that both the degree as well as nature of projects are analyzed in order to identify appropriate tools that are helpful in resolving the project complications as per their nature as well as complexities. It is analyzed that the project uses different tools as per their nature and complexities. The project nature and degree can be reviewed by analyzing the project successfully. It is analyzed proper analysis is required in order to adopt steps or tools that are helpful in resolving project conflict that are mainly associated with the project. Both the case studies are analyzed appropriately and as a result proper steps for resolving their complications are provided successfully. Overall Discussion The entire paper discusses about the project complexities that are mainly faces while involving within the project. The complexity theory of the project mainly helps in understanding the social behaviors of both the network of people as well as team who are generally involved within the project. It is stated by Martens and Carvalho (2017) that complexity within the project is generally considered relative to the understanding of an individual and as there are certain limits of understanding thus complexity within the project is considered as one of the characteristic. It is analyzed that many of the organization generally develop proper means for assessing the complexity of the project. It is opined by Floricel et al. (2014) that a project manager also faces number of behavioral complexity however their own response can create number of additional complexity within the projects. It is analyzed by the management as well as senior practitioners of the project that complexity of the pro ject mainly helps in influencing both schedule as well as cost estimates of the project. In this paper causes, environments as well as properties of complex projects are elaborated. It is analyzed that for designing as well as constructing T-REX project, the project managers as well as contractors faces number of challenges as issues. The paper analyzes the causes of project complexities and the reasons include unhelpful behavior, failure to appreciate systemicity, simplistic project management as well as over-ambitious strategic management (San Cristobal 2017). It is analyzed that complexity within the T-REX project occurs as the team members of the project are from different cultures as well as interests and as a result they faces difficulty in providing proper rational decision on the project. The project manager of the T-REX project faces number of behavioral complexity however their response on that behavior creates additional complexity. It is identified that responding to number of disruption by taking number of decisions generally seek for recovering the original planned schedule which generally can create feedback loop with numerous unintended consequences (Braglia and Frosolini 2014). The over ambitious strategic management also helps in enhancing complexity in business as well as projects. In addition to this, it is found that the properties as well as environment of the project must be properly analyzed in order to implement proper environmental awareness program for the project managers as well as team members of the project so that they can be able to resolve the project complexities quite effectively (Eskerod, Huemann and Savage 2015). On the other hand, it is identified that the use of proper project management tools and techniques within the project by the project managers helps in playing an important role in project management. It is identified that Arrow Construction Australia, which is one of the construction company, refurbished Scott base in Antarctica by braving different harsh conditions as well as limited months of daylight. This is only possible due to proper management by the project managers as well as contractors of the project (Shenhar et al. 2016).The tools and techniques that are utilized by the management of the company include risk management, Gantt chart, work breakdown structure, budgeting process as well as critical path analysis. The utilization of proper tools and techniques is done by recognizing the type of project complexity. It is stated by Martinsuo and Hoverfalt (2018) that different kinds of complexity generally requires different approaches of project management and thus it is very much useful to recognize various types of project complexities for selecting the appropriate approaches as well as tools and techniques in order to manage the project effectively. It is identified that strategies for managing various kinds of complexity is generally exhibited by various projects as various parts of the project generally vary enormously. In addition to this, it is analyzed that determination of proper nature as well as degree is very much necessary to determine the level of complexity that is affecting the progress of the project. The nature as well as degree of complexity is generally identified by reviewing the projects effectively. It is opined by Bentahar and Cameron (2015) that the degree of project complexity is found to be important as it generally affects project internalization, future changes as well as project recognition (Tzortzopoulos, Zhang and Formoso 2016). One of the significant tools that are mainly used within the project in order to classify them for recognizing the complications those are mainly associated with the project. After proper identification, nature as well as expected level of complications within the project can be improved at the project initiation phase in order to monitor as well as control the complexities that are mainly associated with the project (Eskerod, Huemann and Savage 20 15). The paper also focuses on the ways in which the practitioners as well as organizations respond towards project complexities. In order to manage complex projects it is very much necessary to resolve the problems like integration challenges, interactional uncertainty as well as improper project team. Conclusion It can be concluded from the entire assignment that the complexities that occur within the project must be resolved appropriately by using appropriate approaches as well as tools so that the project managers can be able to complete the project effectively. In this paper, causes, environments as well as properties of project complexities are generally illustrated in order to analyze the reasons of complexities within the project. It is analyzed that proper analysis is done on the design as well as construction of T-REX project in order to know the reasons behind the complexities of the project. The project manager founds that proper environmental awareness program is very much required in order to execute the complex project effectively. In addition to this the paper also focuses on the Arrow construction company that resolves its complexities by utilizing proper project management tools and techniques. The selection of project management tools as well as approaches is done by the pro ject manager as per the level of project complexity. It is analyzed that the tools and techniques that are used includes risk management, Gantt chart, work breakdown structure, budgeting process as well as critical path analysis. All this tools and approaches are helpful in mitigating the complexities that the Arrow construction company faces. In addition to this, the paper also focuses on the nature as well as on the degree of project management. It is analyzed that proper analysis of project nature as well as degree is necessary in order to make sure the levels of complexities that going is to affect the project. Furthermore, the paper discusses proper method of identifying nature as well as degree of project for determining the complications so that they can be monitored as well as controlled before the initiation phase of the project. The entire paper also reflects on the ways that is mainly used by the stakeholders as well as practitioners of the project in order to respond suc cessfully to different project related complexities. Additionally, it is identified that for managing complex projects it is very much important to resolve the problems like integration challenges, interactional uncertainty as well as issues related with the project team. References Ahern, T., Leavy, B. and Byrne, P.J., 2014. Complex project management as complex problem solving: A distributed knowledge management perspective.International Journal of Project Management,32(8), pp.1371-1381. Baptista, A., Santos, F., Pscoa, J. and Sndig, N., 2016. Project management methodologies as main tool for current challenges in global economy driving historical changes.Journal of Advanced Management Science,4(2). Bentahar, O. and Cameron, R., 2015. Design and Implementation of a Mixed Method Research Study in Project Management.Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods,13(1). Bing.com. (2018).Arrow Construction Australia Case Study - MBS. [online] Available at: https://www.bing.com/cr?IG=B01D39EADAA041B4A9962BFBF3570C2CCID=02EA58F5B2A0613F09DC5379B30F608Brd=1h=1N_jj0AHVqJTwWlmYULINXpLF6z8WxGLnTiQ3xA3Mv0v=1r=https%3a%2f%2fmbs.edu%2feducation-development%2fexeceducation%2fcase-studies%2fopen-programs%2farrowconstructionaustraliap=DevEx,5067.1 [Accessed 4 Feb. 2018]. Braglia, M. and Frosolini, M., 2014. An integrated approach to implement project management information systems within the extended enterprise.International Journal of Project Management,32(1), pp.18-29. Browning, T.R., 2014. Managing complex project process models with a process architecture framework.International Journal of Project Management,32(2), pp.229-241. Conforto, E.C., Salum, F., Amaral, D.C., da Silva, S.L. and de Almeida, L.F.M., 2014. Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development?.Project Management Journal,45(3), pp.21-34. Eskerod, P., Huemann, M. and Savage, G., 2015. Project stakeholder managementpast and present.Project Management Journal,46(6), pp.6-14. Fisher, C.M., Pillemer, J. and Amabile, T.M., 2017. Deep help in complex project work: Guiding and path-clearing across difficult terrain.Academy of Management Journal, pp.amj-2016. Fleming, Q.W. and Koppelman, J.M., 2016, December. Earned value project management. Project Management Institute. Floricel, S., Bonneau, C., Aubry, M. and Sergi, V., 2014. Extending project management research: Insights from social theories.International Journal of Project Management,32(7), pp.1091-1107. Heagney, J., 2016.Fundamentals of project management. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. Heldman, K., 2015.PMP project management professional exam deluxe study guide: updated for the 2015 Exam. John Wiley Sons. Hornstein, H.A., 2015. The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), pp.291-298. Kassem, M., Kelly, G., Dawood, N., Serginson, M. and Lockley, S., 2015. BIM in facilities management applications: a case study of a large university complex.Built Environment Project and Asset Management,5(3), pp.261-277. Kerzner, H., 2017.Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley Sons. Klakegg, O.J., 2016. Project Risk Management: Challenge Established Practice. Klein, L., Biesenthal, C. and Dehlin, E., 2015. Improvisation in project management: A praxeology.International journal of project management,33(2), pp.267-277. Lientz, B. and Rea, K., 2016.Breakthrough technology project management. Routledge. Locatelli, G., Mancini, M. and Romano, E., 2014. Systems Engineering to improve the governance in complex project environments.International Journal of Project Management,32(8), pp.1395-1410. Lu, Y., Luo, L., Wang, H., Le, Y. and Shi, Q., 2015. Measurement model of project complexity for large-scale projects from task and organization perspective.International Journal of Project Management,33(3), pp.610-622. Lu, Y., Luo, L., Wang, H., Le, Y. and Shi, Q., 2015. Measurement model of project complexity for large-scale projects from task and organization perspective.International Journal of Project Management,33(3), pp.610-622. Martens, M.L. and Carvalho, M.M., 2017. Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers' perspective.International Journal of Project Management,35(6), pp.1084-1102. Martens, M.L. and Carvalho, M.M., 2017. Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers' perspective.International Journal of Project Management,35(6), pp.1084-1102. Martinsuo, M. and Hoverflt, P., 2018. Change program management: Toward a capability for managing value-oriented, integrated multi-project change in its context.International Journal of Project Management,36(1), pp.134-146. McKenna, A. and Baume, G., 2015. Complex project conceptualization and the linguistic turn; the case of a small Australian construction company.International Journal of Project Management,33(7), pp.1476-1483. Mir, F.A. and Pinnington, A.H., 2014. Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success.International journal of project management,32(2), pp.202-217. Mok, K.Y., Shen, G.Q. and Yang, J., 2015. Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), pp.446-457. Puerto, C., Shane, J. and Gransberg, D. (2013).A Case Study In Complex Project Management: T-Rex. [online] Academia.edu. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/16243824/A_Case_Study_In_Complex_Project_Management_T-Rex [Accessed 4 Feb. 2018]. Rezvani, A., Chang, A., Wiewiora, A., Ashkanasy, N.M., Jordan, P.J. and Zolin, R., 2016. Manager emotional intelligence and project success: The mediating role of job satisfaction and trust.International Journal of Project Management,34(7), pp.1112-1122. Rezvani, A., Chang, A., Wiewiora, A., Ashkanasy, N.M., Jordan, P.J. and Zolin, R., 2016. Manager emotional intelligence and project success: The mediating role of job satisfaction and trust.International Journal of Project Management,34(7), pp.1112-1122. Riol, H. and Thuillier, D., 2015. Project management for academic research projects: balancing structure and flexibility.International Journal of Project Organisation and Management,7(3), pp.251-269. San Cristbal, J.R., 2017. Complexity in Project Management.Procedia Computer Science,121, pp.762-766. Schwalbe, K., 2015.Information technology project management. Cengage Learning. Shenhar, A.J., Holzmann, V., Melamed, B. and Zhao, Y., 2016. The Challenge of Innovation in Highly Complex Projects: What Can We Learn from Boeing's Dreamliner Experience?.Project Management Journal,47(2), pp.62-78 Sudlow, C., Gallacher, J., Allen, N., Beral, V., Burton, P., Danesh, J., Downey, P., Elliott, P., Green, J., Landray, M. and Liu, B., 2015. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age.PLoS medicine,12(3), p.e1001779. Svejvig, P. and Andersen, P., 2015. Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), pp.278-290. Todorovi?, M.L., Petrovi?, D.?., Mihi?, M.M., Obradovi?, V.L. and Bushuyev, S.D., 2015. Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management.International Journal of Project Management,33(4), pp.772-783. Tzortzopoulos, P., Zhang, Y. and Formoso, C.T., 2016. Managing Complex Social Housing Urban Redevelopment Projects through Improved Project Management and Value Generation. Book of Abstracts Verzuh, E., 2015.The fast forward MBA in project management. John Wiley Sons.